Skip to content

Does Personal Branding Have a Branding Problem?

Why do so many business leaders understand the value of visibility, but still feel uncomfortable with what personal branding has come to represent?

If you spend enough time talking to founders, business owners and senior leaders, the advice you’ll hear they are always given becomes very familiar.

Be more visible. Share what you know. Put yourself out there. Build your personal brand.

There’s nothing particularly controversial about that advice. In fact, not at all. We advise exactly the same thing.

Long before someone contacts a business, there’s a good chance they’ve already done some research. They may have visited the website, looked at LinkedIn, read a few posts and tried to get a sense of the people behind the company.

They’re often trying to answer fairly simple questions. Does this person understand the challenge I’m facing? Do they seem credible? Do I feel confident enough to start a conversation with them?

Most experienced leaders already understand that. They know visibility can help build trust, strengthen relationships and give prospective clients greater confidence in the people behind the business.

Yet mention the words personal branding and something often changes.

The resistance isn’t usually to visibility itself. It’s to everything people have come to associate with the phrase. Perhaps then, personal branding has a branding problem of its own.

When personal branding starts to feel like performance

For many leaders, personal branding no longer sounds like simply sharing what you know. It sounds like performing it.

There’s a particular version of personal branding that has become very visible online: carefully curated stories, polished photographs, opinions on every new trend and a sense that almost every meeting, success, challenge or lesson should somehow become content.

For some, even the phrase itself can feel a little bit icky.

Whether that perception represents personal branding at its best isn’t really the point. If that’s what someone believes they’re signing up for, it’s understandable that they’d rather spend their time running the business.

And running a business already takes plenty of it. Clients need attention, teams need support, decisions need making and there’s always something else competing for headspace. Adding “become a content creator” to the list can quickly make visibility feel like another obligation rather than an opportunity.

The irony is that many of the leaders least comfortable with the idea of personal branding are also the people with the most experience worth sharing.

They’ve spent years solving difficult problems, building relationships, developing judgement and earning trust through the quality of their work. Their reputation was built through what they did, not through how often they appeared online.

Somewhere along the way, though, visibility became tangled up with performance.

Instead of feeling like an opportunity to share expertise, it began to feel like an expectation to become a different version of yourself.

Those are two very different things.

A lack of ideas is rarely the real problem

There’s another assumption worth challenging: that leaders who don’t post very often simply don’t know what to say.

That’s rarely what we see.

Listen to an experienced founder talking through a client problem, explaining a difficult decision or helping someone in their team and there’s usually no shortage of ideas.

Some stories reveal how they think. Examples that show what experience has taught them. Opinions formed through years of doing the work rather than reacting to whatever happens to be getting attention on LinkedIn.

The raw material is already there.

It just doesn’t usually appear while someone is sitting in front of a blank document trying to “create content”.

It appears in conversations.

That’s why someone can explain something brilliantly to a client in the morning and then say later that day that they have absolutely no idea what they could possibly post about.

It sounds contradictory, but it makes complete sense.

Talking and writing ask different things of us. Many people think more naturally when another person is asking questions, challenging an idea or giving them something specific to respond to. Put the same person in front of a blinking cursor and suddenly those ideas can feel much harder to access.

What looks like a shortage of ideas is often a shortage of time, structure and headspace.

Expertise isn’t the uncomfortable part

Most business leaders are perfectly happy to talk about what they know when there’s a reason for doing it. They can explain a problem to a client, share a lesson with a colleague or talk through why one approach might work better than another.

Where things often become uncomfortable is when sharing expertise begins to feel like promoting themselves.

Harvard Business School has described this tension as the “braggart’s dilemma”: the challenge of making your abilities visible without feeling as though you’re boasting. It’s something many experienced professionals recognise immediately. They know they have knowledge worth sharing, but they don’t want to sound boastful, over-rehearsed or insincere in the process.

That’s why telling someone to “post more consistently” can miss the point.

Consistency may not be the real barrier.

If the only version of visibility someone can picture feels performative or unnatural, deciding not to take part can feel entirely reasonable.

Trust is often formed before the first conversation

None of this changes the fact that buying behaviour has shifted.

Recommendations, reputation and good work still matter enormously. So does having a strong website and a credible business presence.

But increasingly, people want some reassurance before they make contact. They want to know who is behind the organisation, how that person approaches problems and whether there’s evidence of the experience they claim to have.

The Edelman Trust Barometer has repeatedly highlighted the importance of credible human voices in building trust. People don’t only evaluate organisations; they pay attention to the people who represent them.

That doesn’t mean every leader needs to become an influencer, document their personal life or post every day. It simply means people like to know who they’re dealing with.

There’s an important distinction here.

Attention is about reaching as many people as possible. Visibility is about helping the right people understand you. Those aren’t the same objective.

Most businesses don’t need broader attention. They need clearer understanding.

The best content is usually hiding in plain sight

One of the reasons we talk so much about conversations at Colour Me Social is because we’ve seen where the strongest content actually comes from.

It isn’t usually the hour someone sets aside to “create content”.

It’s the explanation they find themselves repeating during every sales meeting. The customer question that comes up again and again. The story they tell when they’re helping a colleague understand why something matters. The opinion they share during a strategy session that makes everyone around the table stop and think.

Those moments already contain experience, judgement and personality. They’re already demonstrating credibility.

The challenge is recognising that they’re happening and capturing them before they disappear back into the working day.

That’s very different from manufacturing a personal brand. It’s making better use of the thinking that’s already there. We often say that the best leadership content rarely starts with a blank document. It starts with a conversation. Not because conversations are somehow magical, but because that’s where people naturally reveal how they think. Their language becomes more relaxed. Their stories become more specific. Their personality appears without trying.

That’s much harder to manufacture, and much easier to trust.

It’s also what generic AI content often lacks. AI can help organise, shape and repurpose ideas, but without the leader’s own thinking, language and experience underneath it, polished words can still feel strangely interchangeable.

Perhaps we need a different conversation

Maybe the problem isn’t personal branding itself. Maybe it’s the expectations we’ve attached to it.

If becoming visible feels like becoming someone else, it’s understandable that many experienced leaders would rather opt out altogether. But visibility doesn’t have to involve constant posting, carefully constructed authenticity or becoming a full-time content creator. It can be much simpler than that.

Helping the right people understand how you think before they meet you. Making your experience easier to discover. Allowing some of the conversations you already have every day to work a little harder for your business.

For many leaders, that feels like a far more realistic ambition than “building a personal brand”.

The expertise was never missing. Neither were the ideas. What is often missing is a process for capturing that thinking and turning it into something that can be shared without losing the person behind it.

That’s the thinking behind Leader Brand.

Rather than asking busy leaders to become content creators, we start with a conversation and turn their existing thinking into content that still sounds recognisably like them.

One hour. One conversation. A month of content.